By Ashlyn White, Policy Intern
Hosting the Olympic Games is a
daunting task for any country to take on. Infrastructure improvements, massive
building projects, and logistical planning of where everything and everyone are
going to go are just a few of the things that need to be worked out during the
preparation stages. Another critical component is figuring out how the Games
will be powered. Every single stadium, venue, and building within the Olympic
Village, along with the International Broadcast Center, need reliable energy to
ensure the Games run smoothly. This is in addition to the increased energy needs
of the many spectators, which include things like transportation to and from
the venues. For Brazil and Rio de Janeiro, the 2016 Summer Olympic Games have
been a source of serious controversy in many areas, including the strains it
will have on the country’s energy supply.
Hydropower is the main source of
Brazilian electricity and accounts
for 70 percent of the country’s production. Unfortunately, Brazil is in the
middle of a serious
drought, which has impacts on the country’s ability to produce enough hydropower
to meet the needs of everyday citizens and will severely strain the grid’s
ability to support the Games. The Brazilian energy crisis
has led to serious cutbacks, including cutting the power to people’s homes and
businesses for extended periods at a time. Still, Brazil’s goal is to keep
as much of the Games on the grid as possible to take advantage of the country’s
available renewable energy capacity. However, Rio suffers from rolling
blackouts as a result of low energy production, and the back-up strategy will rely
on diesel-powered generators, as it is too
late to build the solar energy infrastructure that was originally planned. Brazil
faced similar problems when it hosted the World Cup in 2014, and the government
spent $5
billion to subsidize fossil fuel generators as a result.
While Rio is not
unique in failing to deliver on its environmental promises compared to
previous Olympic host cities, it is certainly disappointing. Rio had promised
to host the “Green
Games for a Blue Planet” by using clean energy, upgrading low income
neighborhoods, preserving natural spaces, and significantly improving public
transportation to clear up the streets and control smog. As with many previous
Olympic host cities, budget
constraints and poor planning are to blame when these ambitious
environmental and energy projects get cut. Jay Coakley of the University of
Colorado studies the impacts of massive events like the Olympics, and as he
explained in an interview with The
Atlantic, “if
money hasn’t been allocated up front, what can happen is a city or region
goes so deeply into debt and there’s so little money or energy left to complete
those projects.” Rio
itself fell victim to this in 2014 when they hosted the World Cup. For
example, the committee in charge of organizing the World Cup never broke ground
on a proposed high-speed rail line between Sao Paulo and Rio that was meant to
reduce vehicle emissions, nor did they ever put up the solar panels that were
meant to power the various stadiums.
With only a little over a week to
go until the Games’ Opening Ceremonies and dozens of very major problems left
to be solved, it is clear that whatever renewable energy goals Rio’s Olympic
Committee had at the outset will not come to fruition now. Looking ahead,
Pyeongchang and Tokyo are looking much more likely to deliver more
environmentally friendly Olympic Games that use renewable energy technology.
For example, Pyeongchang plans to power their 2018 Winter Olympic Games with 100
percent renewable energy from new and existing power plants that rely on
solar and geothermal energy. While this is a lofty goal, they are already well
set up to meet it, considering they currently have the capabilities to generate
145 MW out of the 190 MW of capacity that will be needed to power the Games.
Further, they have plans to erect a number of wind
farms to generate 100 percent renewable energy and to develop their
electric transportation infrastructure, all by 2017. Tokyo
also has big goals for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games and plans to power their
Olympic Stadium with solar power, install a rainwater retention system, and build
the Olympic Village to utilize renewable energy systems like solar, seawater heat
pumps, and biogas power generated from food waste. While there are several
years to go between now and the Pyeongchang and Tokyo Games and anything could
happen to derail their plans, it seems that both cities have looked to the
disappointments of Rio and are being much more proactive in their renewable
energy and sustainability goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment