As
I reported last week, offshore wind energy will soon be flowing to the
residents of Block Island, Rhode Island. Yet some
continue to question the costs of Block Island Wind Farm (BIWF): will this
project benefit the electricity consumers as much as it benefits the industry?
Financing renewable energy projects is no small feat. Developers
typically need to lock in a contract proving to stockholders and regulators
that the investment will be recovered. In part, financial difficulties explain
some of the failed offshore wind projects of the past, such as Oregon’s
WindFloat Pacific. The WindFloat Pacific project would have created floating
offshore wind turbines near Coos Bay, Oregon (where the ocean floor is too deep
for anchored turbines like at BIWF). Competing with low electricity prices from
cheap hydroelectric, however, the project was unable to secure a contract
from a power purchaser. (Note though that hydroelectric power generation has
its environmental problems and is not
a guaranteed long-term electricity source.) Without such a contract and lacking
regulatory approval, the Windfloat Pacific Project stalled.
At Block Island, BIWF did not have to compete with cheap
hydroelectric power. Instead, the islanders rely on imported diesel fuel, costing
about $0.50/kwh currently, or five times the average electricity rate in the
U.S. of $0.10/kWh. Under BIWF’s contract with utility National Grid,
rate-paying islanders’ current electricity prices will drop to $0.30/kWh. Mainlanders,
in contrast, who receive the excess wind energy, will face above-market rates
in order to finance the $440
project. But some continue to question
whether the price difference for the islanders reflects the whole story and
will truly result in greater savings for the islanders or the state. (For an
inside look at some of the intricacies of ratemaking, you can read about one of
the Public Utility Commission meetings discussing BIWF here.)
According to
the Rhode Island Public Radio, the true value of BIWF will not be clear for
several years. While analysts can consider the current price of diesel fuel
(the island’s previous fuel source) and compare it to the contractual price for
offshore wind energy, the price of diesel varies. Long-term price stability is one
of many benefits of renewable energy sources. Renewables offer additional
benefits as well, many of which have not historically been considered in
ratemaking, such as lower emissions and greater independence from global
markets. For example, consider this
proposal to build offshore wind farms in order to mitigate hurricane damage
by reducing wind speed at a projected net cost of...zero. Yet whatever the net
cost of a project, it is the upfront cost that can be daunting to developers,
utilities, and regulators.
Fortunately, according to a new study
just published
in Nature Energy, the cost of each type of wind energy (onshore, offshore,
and offshore floating) is projected to drop substantially in the coming
decades. From 2014 to 2030, experts project a 24-30% reduction in costs; by
2050, they project a total reduction of 35-41%. While future costs are
difficult to predict with much accuracy, the study surveyed 163 experts, the
largest elicitation study on energy ever conducted.
NICE BLOG.
ReplyDeleteOffshore Development Companies
Offshore Web Application Development Company India
Very good information.
ReplyDeleteOffshore Development
Web Application Development Services
thanks for sharing information......
ReplyDeleteEnergy Analysis
Energy Analysisin USA
Energy Analysis in UK
Energy Analysis in India
Hi there! Nice stuff, do keep me posted when you post again something like this! 4gbps servers
ReplyDelete