By Amelia Schlusser,
Staff Attorney
The southwestern United States is one step closer to
constructing a new transmission line that would substantially increase
renewable energy development in New Mexico and Arizona. On Saturday, January
24, U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary
Sally Jewell announced that she has approved a Record of Decision (ROD) from
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) authorizing the SunZia Southwest
Transmission project. The SunZia project is a proposed 515-mile transmission
line that would transport power from northeast New Mexico to southeast Arizona.
According to the project’s proponents, the new line will facilitate substantial
renewable energy development in the state. The SunZia line is projected to
carry at least 3,000 megawatts of mostly wind- and solar-generated electricity.
Secretary Jewell noted that this transmission capacity would provide enough
renewable energy to power one million homes while reducing carbon emissions by
4.5 million metric tons per year.
In addition to displacing the emissions from 890,000 cars
annually, the transmission line’s construction and renewable energy development
would provide much-needed jobs for New Mexico and Arizona. The transmission
project is expected to create 6,000 construction jobs and 100 permanent jobs.
More significantly, the line will open the door to dramatic renewable energy
development with the potential to create 40,000 jobs.
“The SunZia Project will help unlock the abundant renewable
energy resources in the Southwest, creating jobs and bringing reliable,
sustainable power to a growing corner of our country,” said Secretary Jewell. "It's
an opportunity really for the state to make an investment in a future that is
not tied to commodity prices, the vagaries of oil and gas prices and the
boom-and-bust cycle that is so prevalent in that industry," the Secretary
explained to the Associated Press.
The National Security
Debate
While the SunZia project has tremendous potential to expand
renewable energy development in New Mexico, the project’s proposed route has
attracted harsh criticism from U.S. Representative Steve Pearce (R-NM).
According to a recent Greenwire article, the
Congressman fears that the line will compromise national security. Pearce argued that
the project’s route near the White Sands missile range “‘will dramatically
impair’ the missile range’s mission ‘to test defense systems critical to the
protection of our nation and troops.’”
SunZia’s proposed
route does not cross the federal White Sands missile range (WSMR) itself,
but it does cross the WSMR’s Northern
Extension Area, a network of private land and leased public land that the
Department of Defense (DOD) often evacuates prior to conducting missile tests
in the WSMR. In response
to Army concerns that the high-tower line could disrupt testing and
training in the range, the BLM worked closely with the DOD to mitigate the
project’s impacts. SunZia’s developers ultimately agreed to bury the power line
segments that run through the Northern Expansion Area.
The DOD ultimately did not object to the SunZia project, and
Katherine Hammock, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations,
Energy and Environment, asserted that the project makes America stronger. “It
allows for the more rapid uptake of vital renewable energy, stimulates jobs,
and preserves mission capability at White Sands Missile Range, one of the most
unique training and testing facilities in the world," said
Assistant Secretary Hammock.
However, the DOD/BLM compromise did little to pacify Rep.
Pearce, who issued a
statement opposing the project the day before Secretary Jewell approved the
ROD. “It appears that, with one stroke of a pen, Secretary Jewell will permanently
damage our national security,” wrote Pearce.
Pearce’s opposition raises a compelling question regarding
the nature of “national security” and the actions we take to protect it. Assuming
that Rep. Pearce’s doom-invoking contention is even nominally accurate (which
is highly unlikely), the threat that the Congressman fears should be outweighed
by the benefits the new transmission line can provide. Which scenario
realistically presents a greater threat to the security of our country: one in
which federal missile testing is temporarily and moderately restricted, or one
in which one million homes continue to rely almost exclusively on fossil fuels
for electricity?
No comments:
Post a Comment